Certainly with two of the projects that received funding, like Don's project...he talked about Keephills TransAlta, Scotford Upgrader, proven technology on proven sites, where there's good storage capability. Swan Hills—in situ coal gasification capture there. I'd say it's speculative; it's more on the R and D side. And the enhanced project, the Alberta carbon trunk line, is developing infrastructure without thinking through the capture side first. I personally have some questions around that. Were I to choose to seed CCS projects, I wouldn't build in structure first; I'd build capture.
Getting back to your point about the oil sands, sure we need R and D to bring the price down. Ultimately we see it as a constraint in the oil sands; water is also a constraint, as well as regular air emissions, impacts on biodiversity. And if we can't figure out those constraints, then maybe we should think about the pace and scale of oil sands development. That is but one. At least there it's no guarantee, but there is certainly some thinking and some research going into it. Whether it's the right technology for the oil sands or something else, some other greenhouse gas abatement technology for the oil sands, I don't know, but certainly our institute says to figure that out before we go and rapidly increase development.