We certainly felt that there was a very compelling case for continuing ecoENERGY from a purely economic point of view, just in terms of stimulating investment and stimulating industrial development, but also in environmental terms. As I indicated before, I think wind has to be a part of achieving the government's target of 90% non-emitting by 2020. There are very few options, and wind is one of the only ones you can put in the ground by 2020.
As I indicated, Minister Prentice had suggested that the way forward was to establish a regulatory framework for carbon emissions, basically a carbon market. We certainly support that.
But it's important to point out that the United States and Europe and most countries that have been successful take two approaches to it. There is indirect support, which is the creation of a carbon market, which helps to level the playing field. But then there are also direct incentives for wind. The Recovery Act has a production tax credit for wind, and it's also looking at establishment of a carbon market. The two work very much side by side.