On that last point, we're almost there, right? I think Mr. Regan's point is that we will be informed by what happens. My suspicion, having seen the processes here before, is that we submit witnesses and the clerk begins putting meetings together. Some of them come together quicker than others. I think the idea of keeping the list somewhat open, as Mr. Regan suggested, based on what we hear on the Thursday, is something we should be open to. The committee is the master of its own fate. It can initiate those first few meetings and then say it wants to tack on any group that we need to hear from. I think we should be open to that. But we're almost there. I think it's a smaller point, frankly, as to whether we're open to more new witnesses, but sure, it sounds fine.
