The concern has been raised that we have been moving from rules and regulations to guidelines, goal-oriented guidelines. You referred to them earlier.
In the U.S. it's a regulation, where companies must prove the best available and safest technology. That's a rule. It's not a guideline, and it's not goal-oriented.
Switch over to Canada in 2009, where you moved from a regulation to a guideline that says that the equipment must be adequate and “reliably operating”. This seems a lot less secure to me.
Can you tell me why not?