To answer your first question, all I can comment on is the makeup of the board. It's worth reflecting on what the board's mandate is in this regard. The board's mandate is, first, safety, and second, environmental protection. If you look at the expertise that the board is bringing--and I understand that these are appointments made by the ministers of natural resources--it's economics, it's finances, it's industry engineering expertise. None of those really speaks either to safety or to environment, yet these people are making very important decisions about what's happening.
I understand that maybe they're not involved in the day-to-day decision-making process, but nonetheless I find it really quite odd that there is nobody on the board who says they have environmental expertise, given that protecting the environment is their number two mandate.