No.
We have to qualify that by saying we have to understand the findings of all of this. I'm saying that if you have a drilling program approval that requires you to have two barriers and maintain two barriers, then nobody in that chain of command should ever, ever decide to go back to having only one barrier, which is what the BOP situation is. There's a lot of confusion and there are mixed messages about what happened with the BOP. We won't know for sure. But if you don't have a good cement bond in the beginning--which is your barrier when you're getting ready to leave... You have a cased hole, and you're supposed to have centralizers on the casing to make sure all the cement goes all the way outside of that casing. If that casing is leaning to one side because it's not centralized properly, and you didn't get cement all the way up through it, and you get ready to leave that well, now you've displaced the mud inside of that casing and let the formation fluids go. What happens is that anything in that well can shift up into the BOP and block all of your fail-safe functions.
Now you have six rams. In answer to the question that was raised earlier, a BOP doesn't just cut the pipe off, it also seals around a number of different diameters of tools that we're using, so by design you have redundancy six times over in the BOP. But if you push everything up inside the BOP because it's not cemented properly, now you have a catastrophe, because that last resort you have can't close around that diameter because it wasn't designed to close around that bigger diameter, and it couldn't share that big diameter.