Mr. Amos, I believe, like you, that it's not an à la carte menu. You need a balanced approach. You have to cover the needs of Canadian people regarding their energy safety and security, but safety is also an issue, and you don't want to have collateral damage.
On a technical basis, how do you reconcile the fact that the NEB has a regulatory power with the need to be respectful of the jurisdiction because it is owned by the provinces and the territory, except at the Arctic level? How can you believe that the NEB can be efficient as a watchdog in the case of what I mentioned earlier regarding emergencies and all that?