So from your members' perspective, there hadn't been a discussion of a pause.
I want to turn to Mr. Amos for a second. You'll be interested to hear that we had the head of the NEB in front of us the other day, and I think he confirmed what you said this morning about the review going on in the Arctic not being what the House of Commons passed unanimously as a motion to review unconventional sources, despite what the government says in question period and other places.
Why would it matter to Canada's overall economic, environmental, and cultural health if the government did initiate such a broad and full review of these unconventional sources--and within “unconventional”, I also include Arctic drilling--which has not necessarily been done yet in Canada's experience? How would that aid us, and why must it be done now? Do other countries do it? Are we unique in this? Is it something we stand out on?