With regard to the coastal trading act--it's on the website as well--all of the approvals are given with rationale. The complainants are identified, and so on.
There was an example I used from this past summer. I'll give part two. Part one was that the primary operator in terms of the exploration program, which happened to be off the coast of Labrador, had received approval from the CTA. A second smaller and more junior company, which had an adjacent parcel of land and an adjacent licence, wanted to add onto that program, because this vessel would basically transit this other licence area. This particular company wanted to have this vessel do some seismic work on their adjacent parcel. Even though the original approval was given and rationales were given, there was a protest on that second parcel as well.
In general, most of the protests are made by one Canadian company, and generally they lose. Pretty well every time there's a seismic application offshore, they protest.
The solution, I believe, is a simple one, as we proposed earlier in the consultation round; it's to exempt seismic vessels from the act. Essentially that means that any foreign-flagged seismic vessel could come into Canadian waters to do work, and the issues would be around the business case and not around some of these, in our view, frivolous complaints.