Is that sufficient? I've been involved in some of those land use planning efforts. They don't have anywhere near the scientific effort that an environmental assessment has.
Would it be outside the realm of common thinking to look at individual wells when trying to understand the environmental impacts on, say, the amount of water taken out of a system or the amount of chemicals introduced into a watershed?
Would it not make logical sense to the public, and to you as an industry, to say that we have to take the assessment of the full 100 wells? If we place and lease another 100 wells on top, and another 100 wells on top of that, they're not existing individually. That's insane. They're existing together, and the impact is together.
Is that not true?