At the end of the day, there is only one taxpayer. So if we're going to have duplicate efforts, I don't think that serves the taxpayer well.
I'm not being critical, but in your question you referenced independent monitoring. Although the Energy Resources Conservation Board reports through the Department of Energy, I can tell you it is very independent. We have very strict monitoring by environment officials, who, quite frankly, don't make a lot of friends in government.
I would say we have a very good track record on monitoring, relative to Dr. Schindler. He did a study. The results of his study relative to water were different from what our monitoring was showing us. With Dr. Schindler's input, we appointed a panel to start to verify the data that was being used both by Dr. Schindler and our monitoring panel. Whatever that scientific review comes forward with, we'll abide by.
Beyond the individual regulatory bodies, there is the opportunity to appoint special panels, as we just did.