I'm wondering why you neglected to include the second piece of what the IEA suggests in that 40% increase picture, which is that governments take no action. That's the preface to what that 40% increase says. It also implies, and this is according to the IEA, a six-degree rise in temperature globally. That's the associated reference you just made today. I know you said that it is cold today in Alberta, but I'm hoping you're not suggesting that a prediction of a six-degree rise, and that the government is complicit in such an endeavour, would be a good thing for Canada's energy security.
On December 7th, 2010. See this statement in context.