I have a problem understanding, for two reasons. First, of course, when we're talking about energy sufficiency, that's also about a kind of ownership, right? The bottom line of monitoring is that we need to, of course, enhance the quality of life; we need to protect the quality of life. We don't want to be at the mercy...so that other countries can suck it up.
It's also a transformation. How can we have a more balanced way of protecting people's wealth while at the same time being for free enterprise? There is a balance there, but I have a feeling what I'm hearing from you is that it's a free market, enjoy yourself, and that's it.
In the 1950s, Duplessis was good at that, with iron, but I'm not sure that's the way in the 21st century. We can have the same result without necessarily saying no government at all.