I think he's doing the right thing, certainly, going out and seeing what is taking place in Arkansas, B.C., and other jurisdictions, and learning from the mistakes that have been made and hoping to take a best practices approach. There certainly is a benefit in being able to see what has gone before. The difficulty for New Brunswick will be to find a market for that gas. How will that gas compete economically? But that's a bit off your question. That's another issue.
I think that most likely the regulatory apparatus in New Brunswick will need to be expanded to have the expertise to look at these new issues of shale gas. They'll have to have excellent, on-the-mark regulation, but they'll have to have regulators who are capable. They'll have to have inspectors and so on.
There'll be a number of changes, but I think industry welcomes good sensible regulation, and enforcement as well, because if people are allowed to violate regulations and get off the hook easily without much penalty, it damages the reputation of the industry and hurts the whole process.
So the industry is onside, I would think, ensuring that the regulations from square one are appropriate from a technical point of view, to protect people, to protect the environment, but also ensuring that enforcement is strong and realistic, in the sense that no one can get away with floating, so to speak.