I think it occurs at two levels. One, and I did hold this up, is that this is a 30,000-barrel-a-day conventional heavy oil project that is directly south of ours. This follows a code of practice, much the same way that if you were to build a deck at the back of your house and you have a code of practice, you follow it.
There's a high degree of similarity. These are horizontal wells. This is actually in an oil sand, and this project is 1,800 barrels a day. We're building the code of practice. So with the shift to a code of practice that allows us to move, efficiency is important.
The second level would be with respect to changes the federal government made recently. It has investigated the adequacy of the provincial regulation so the review is adequate for purposes of meeting federal requirements.
With Navigable Waters, for example, their reviews on bridges and access to the various projects have been modified so that as part of the review provincially it's not also done federally. That would be a clear example of the efficacy of seeing that the right things are being done. But there is efficiency, in that it isn't done twice.