To that specific question, then, a recent report from a U.S. presidential panel on Arctic drilling said that there's no ability to deal with blowouts in Arctic conditions. That's on the U.S. side; I assume it has to be similar for the Canadian side--the same water, the same ice, the same conditions.
You won a bid for $103 million for drilling rights in the Arctic. You're bidding again for another $103 million for 200,000-plus hectares. The same-season relief well has been argued against by your company and other companies...the ability to drill same-season relief wells, which we know is a challenge in the Arctic.
After the experiences in the gulf, though, is it not prudent, under the stipulations that Chevron claims, to put a halt to continuing to develop these leases if you're not able to contain a blowout in a same-season manner?