I understand that, and I understand that the resources may be vast. The question I have....
You speak proudly of Chevron's record, but there of course have been blemishes, if we can say...the Ecuadorian experience, what's happened in New Jersey, Salt Lake City, the Shetland Islands, Angola, California, the Louisiana gulf itself. There have been problems. The company is not without blame in cases of spilling many millions of barrels, in some cases.
I don't understand, though; if you're committed to environmental stewardship and protection of the environment, we know the importance of at least having the capacity of the same-season relief well, which is currently on the books in Canada. Your company and others argued against this regulation, partly because same-season relief wells are impossible to drill in an Arctic environment. The U.S. presidential panel came down and said that there's no ability to deal with blowouts in Arctic conditions, and warned against issuing any permits on the U.S. side. This is not a panel struck by Greenpeace; these are folks who work in the industry. They were set up by the President.
Shell has scrapped its plans to drill in the Arctic this year. You folks are going ahead.