Thank you for the question. I do want to make sure that it is fully understood--some of the changes that occurred in the contracting process and some of the learning that was applied in negotiating the G2 contract with Hydro-Québec.
It is indeed a fundamentally different contract with a very different scope and very different elements of risk, and substantially less risk for AECL and for the Government of Canada in that contract. Nothing in nuclear has no risk, but relative to the previous contracts, we certainly learned and applied those lessons in the way that contract was negotiated and signed.
We have less scope, we have less exposure to very significant areas of cost escalation, and yet of course we obviously have obligations we have to fulfill. So yes, there is risk. If we did not fulfill our contractual responsibilities, we would need to bear responsibility for that, but the degree and nature of risk is very different and much lower than we undertook in other projects.