Thank you.
I have a couple of questions. Just cutting to the quick with respect to process...and having been a former mayor, I'm not anti-nuclear, so I don't think this is a demagoguery-implied question.
Would it have better satisfied the concerns that have been raised, and the context you have given us, if an application had been made under the Environmental Protection Act, where the onus is on the applicant to provide an analysis of different alternatives? I don't mean to imply that you exceeded your authority or anything like that. I'm not implying that.
But in terms of satisfying the public, would that process have played better in terms of objectivity and a rational analysis of the issue?