What concerns me is that just recently Bruce Power filled out its 2006 environmental assessment and in that assessment committed to keeping the contaminated material—the nuclear waste—on site.
You say new technology comes about. You contradicted the idea when you said that an environmental assessment—what's written on those pages—is not a contract with the public. I fundamentally disagree with you. Whether it be a mining company or a nuclear outfit that makes an application, and the governing agencies—in this case CEAA—or you agree to what's on the paper, to change the conditions is the changing of a contract. I'm not sure why you disagree with that.