So if anyone listening or in this room had the unfortunate need of a pacemaker, you wouldn't recommend them getting a radioactive pacemaker.
The question is this. I want to get to this apples and oranges comparison that you're doing. You said in your papers here today that more than 60,000 shipments of nuclear materials of some kind or another.... Are you seriously comparing a small box of medical isotopes that decay within hours to thousands of tonnes of nuclear waste with a half-life of 24,000 years? Is that the comparison you've offered to the committee today?