Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Ms. Brunelle, the Commission would not approve the shipment if it were not safe. Allow me to point out that the hue and cry about this project is because of the focus on the word “nuclear”.
The Commission’s decision is based on scientific fact. We conducted comprehensive analysis, which will be independently verified by the United States and Sweden. Consequently, an unsafe project would not get the Commission’s stamp of approval. It is now our job to ensure that people are clearly informed. We all have a leadership role in ensuring the Commission’s findings are based on scientific fact. As the Chair has rightly pointed out, the Commission assessed environmental impact using worst case scenarios. We even developed imaginary scenarios to ensure no impact on those living along the length of the river.