I don't think the commission did the right thing; they bent the rules. They themselves acknowledge that at least six times more than the maximum amount of radioactivity normally allowed on a single vessel has been exceeded, and they're not obliged to give a licence in that condition. They may give a licence. It is said they can make a special arrangement, but why should they, when there is no health or environmental reason to do so? In other words, there isn't a health or environmental justification for this project. Therefore, the CNSC is wrong to have made this decision.
It is also wrong that they act like a proponent. They have done more work in promoting this concept and selling it.... They have even been using slogans from Bruce Power, such as “reducing our environmental footprint” and “it's the right thing to do”. I think this is the wrong thing for a regulatory agency to be doing, and I think that for the Government of Canada, the difficulty here is lack of oversight. I believe the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has grown so close to the industry that there is no longer much separation between them, and that's not good for the future.