Being here as an individual, I can't really comment on how that affects the individual departments involved. Of course we know that some funds will have to come from somewhere. We certainly would like to see that sooner rather than later, just because of the risks involved in significant delays. NRU can be repaired and that's sort of a short-term fix. Planning for the long term has to take place at some point. We do recognize that some risks are involved, in that a new facility would take perhaps 10 years to properly plan, design, and build. That's about the timeframe you're looking at when, perhaps, NRU would no longer be available.
We do see there's a risk involved that, if there's a significant gap between the two facilities, could lead to the loss of a lot of key expertise in Canada. I think that's an important issue that should not be overlooked. If for some reason we no longer had the NRU reactor and there wasn't a certainty of a new facility, I think we would lose critical mass of expertise at Chalk River, probably quite quickly just because most talented scientists and engineers at that facility would be looking for jobs elsewhere.