I would respond to the schedule issue by saying that making predictions is a challenge in an environment where you are dealing with first-of-a-kind technology, and you have now seen the complexity of the challenges we face.
We had adopted a philosophy from the outset that we would base our guidance on the best available evidence and rely on the facts and evidence as we have them, as opposed to speculating. That perhaps put us in a position where we were forced to re-estimate that project schedule on a couple of occasions, more than would be ideal.
At the same time, AECL's management made absolutely the best efforts to be transparent and to provide the best guidance possible. We supported those efforts with external advice from experts in the provision of those estimates, so you have been seeing, in a sense, a reflection of the complexity of the project and the very real requirements to reset the timetable based on the evolution of the weld repairs.