Just to get you right, for competitive advantages, for the research capacity it would give Canada, and for the fragility of the supply chain, which would put Canadian patients at risk, if I follow the logic, if we don't have our own supply, your panel came back with the recommendation that we should build another research facility similar to Chalk River but obviously a bit more modern. I'm assuming your panel also took into account that the Prime Minister essentially did make a bit of a policy statement in saying Canada should be out of the isotope business. Did that not factor into your panel's recommendation? You said it was a policy choice. There's a crossroads here. The Prime Minister seems to have suggested we're going down one of those roads, and it does not involve being in the isotope business.
On March 30th, 2010. See this statement in context.