I can't give you a direct answer on standardization of technology, but as I think you pointed out, Doctor, it's the interchangeability into the reactors. You might have the tubular version as well as the flat panel. To some extent that is a function of how you can fit it into the reactor, because the medical isotope production, the setting up of the racks and the thimbles, if you put next to the core, is a function of how you can get in there and next to the core, and that depends on how the reactor is structured.
As mentioned, the other piece is the processing. We're able to do in Europe both the tubular design that BR2 uses and the flat plate that HFR and Maria use. Understand there's another wrinkle in all of this, and that's the conversion to LEU, low-enriched uranium. That's going to be a whole new generation of targets, and you have to think about that both in terms of processing as well as.... Now, the shape doesn't really change all that much, but it's the processing piece. There's an opportunity now. There's an inflection point to think this through.