I have one more question. I want to just clarify something.
We've been developing new technology to cut down on our greenhouse emissions. I'm assuming that our cost per tonne, because we're developing new technology, is going to be higher than it will be after we have the program levelled out, the technology has been proven, and we're just applying that. The development of technology is going to be higher, so I don't think we can achieve the lowest possible cost per tonne at this point on most of the programs, but that will come.
Am I right in that? I'm referring to Mr. Cullen's assertion that our cost per tonne is far too high, but that's because of the technology we're developing, I'm assuming.