That would be a big simplification. I think we can produce the most meaningful data to help resource companies determine that. It's not a silver bullet on its own. It's better than anything that's out there today, but it actually integrates very well with best practices.
You would work with this data along with existing magnetic data or drilling data or seismic data. It will provide very rapid data for these companies to know where to focus. It will provide information as to where not to go, where clearly there's no prospectivity.
It will also provide information where there is a high probability of prospectivity, but will not provide a definitive NI 43-101 resource that the companies can move forward with. You still need to go on the ground and do physical sampling and drilling. What it does is reduce the number of sites you would actually test. You would move more rapidly to big events that are probably going to be economic, on the scale that the infrastructure and the cost challenges we've heard about require in the Arctic.
So you're going to avoid getting tied up in little things and quickly identify where the big prospecting potential is.