I understand that we're talking around the edges again. We're talking about employment, which is an important thing, and opportunities, or what was referred to as a social science question. I understand that impact benefit agreements keep emerging. They're evolving, they're improving, and most of them remain confidential, particularly some I've come across in northern Alberta recently that I've tried to get access to information about....
But I want to ask the question again. I don't see educational blockage or, for example, lack of educational opportunities as a necessary block to equity participation; that is, to ownership. For example, why couldn't Cameco enter into a joint venture with equity participation? Or is Cameco in joint ventures with equity participation for folks who live on the ground there?