Thank you.
The GEM program objectives are clear. They are to map the north to modern standards, to produce the geoscience knowledge upgraded so that industry will have the right information to reduce its risks for exploration, and also, as we said, to provide updated knowledge for communities for their land use decisions. Those objectives are clear.
Things like permafrost sensitivity, for example, if that's what you mean by sensitive areas, are things we are not necessarily mapping for under the GEM program. But in our other programs, which Dr. Gray referred to—the climate change geoscience program or the environmental geoscience program—as we are gaining this new knowledge and this new information on the north, if the information acquired has some impact on our other program objectives, we'll integrate that into our new project planning but not in the GEM program per se.
It also does provide us internally with some additional information on the geoscience knowledge that we would look into more in depth under the other programs, but not necessarily under the GEM program. That was not in the objectives of the GEM program to start off with.