Thank you.
Just going on a little bit from that process and going to the next phase of questioning, when you look at the proportion you have mapped as part of GEM now, what percentage have you mapped now versus the next phases you are going to do?
Specifically, in one of the early meetings we had on this, we had a map of the territories that showed some of the sensitive areas. Now we see other maps where some of the resources are actually located.
For example, on your slide 9 you have the permafrost and you have some other areas. Do you anticipate you've going to do an overlay of some of the minerals and some other things with the sensitive areas so that when someone goes in and actually looks at an area, you have all that information in one place so that the sensitive areas can be seen as well as the minerals, and ways can be considered to actually mitigate impacts?