The argument has always been made to me that because there is a lack of these agreements in place, there are land claims that haven't been resolved. What we're seeing here in this particular example is that the land claim has been resolved, yet it doesn't seem to be providing any further efficiency than where there's an unresolved land claim dispute causing the same frustration.
What is the incentive to move forward to resolve land claims? I mean, if it is frustrating to develop it from a development perspective—that's what I'm hearing—am I hearing you correctly?