I have two comments. In response to the previous question, ITK would support some of those priorities identified in terms of what could be done immediately, primarily the investment of some additional funds in the institutions set up to review projects in Nunavut.
As Mr. Hanks said, the level of review is exponentially greater than when those boards were first created, and the Planning and Project Assessment Act is very close to being tabled, I understand.
In terms of your second question, I have a point of caution. The main features of the assessment process for projects in Nunavut are very much anchored in the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement. That's a constitutionally protected treaty, so you can't innovate in terms of introducing time limits and processes that are at odds with that agreement. The reason why there is so much shared interest in the new legislation is that the new legislation works very carefully within the treaty.