That's perfect, because it leads to my following question. In March 2011, in The Economist, Pat Bell, the forestry minister for B.C., was quoted as saying that “the time is past when we pretty well had to take what the Americans offered.” That was in response to the trade dispute regarding the pine beetle wood and salvage-grade exports. He was also referring to the growing Asian export market as an alternative to the U.S. market.
Do you think that will give us a reversal of the marketing power that might actually lead us to be able to renegotiate the negative aspects of the softwood lumber agreement?