Concerning the accelerated capital cost allowances, one of the dynamics in the conversations we had when we did the accelerated capital cost allowance was the kind of timeframe you put on that.
One of the things we were very concerned about was wanting industry to invest, whether it be the forest industry or any other industry, which is sort of why we did that. So we have had a scaling down in the last couple of years, and then we extended it again.
If you're trying to create an incentive for companies to invest through a program like that and you make it permanent, and then they decide to not invest for years and years and years, have you really benefited the economy and benefited their operation?
I understand the planning horizon. I do get it, because in big capital projects you really need to have some kind of planning horizon. But how can you balance that decision to make companies move on it, as opposed to just leaving it open-ended and they decide to invest maybe 20 years down the road? That's the challenge we have as a government.