That's right. That's the point I'm trying to make here. Detractors of some of these pipeline projects we talk about, whether that's Keystone or the Northern Gateway pipeline, say that we're simply sending raw products and outshipping all of these jobs, but the reality is that there are thousands and thousands of jobs dependent upon this.
Another example of what the detractors might say is that, for example, if the Gateway pipeline is actually created, it will only have about nine to 50 people actually looking after the long-term maintenance of the pipeline once the initial batch or glut of construction jobs is completed. But the reality is that 400,000 or 500,000 barrels a day is going to result not just in pipeline maintenance jobs, it's going to result in a huge amount of jobs, not only in the construction of or further expansion of the oil sands development in order to meet the demand to fill that pipeline, but also in the ongoing jobs associated with extraction, processing, and upgrading of that bitumen.
How many jobs would that be? Mr. Quinn, I don't know if you're uniquely positioned to answer this question or not, but in order to produce half a million barrels a day in the oil sands, how many jobs would that result in for oil sands workers across our country?