I don't think the duplication of review helps either party. As far as regulatory purposes go, I think there should be more of a collaboration between the first nations and the companies with regard to the EA process. I see that as being important.
Of course, we're both sourcing individuals for professional guidance, and both sides are basically sourcing the same information. The duplication of cost doesn't seem to make any sense. At the end of the day, we're certainly all concerned about the same thing, and that's the environment. We'd like to see that everything that needs to be mitigated is mitigated prior to start-up, etc.
I don't disagree with the idea of consultation. I think it's very important. I think the first nations should know. It's in their community that we're planning on building these mine sites, and they certainly have the right to know what's happening or what's going to happen and what future ramifications there are.
I think we all fully support that.