You know, in the last five years in particular the bar has shifted, and I don't understand it anymore. We thought we understood. We need some direction from the Canadian government to understand exactly.... Our thought on the duty to consult, for instance, was employing people at the early stages and giving them the understanding of what is going on.
In our project in British Columbia, we've had no difficulties whatsoever. We've hired first nations. We use them as dispatching for employment purposes, etc. We’ve consulted, we've completed an MOU with them, and we've completed the traditional knowledge protocol, but the bar has been shifting to a point where I'm starting to wonder what our legal rights are as an exploration company, for instance.
We're working on crown land. At every avenue and whenever possible, we're trying our best to employ aboriginal communities wherever they are within our exploration projects. What I'm seeing right now disturbs me. It really does disturb me, because once again, we're looking for financing from abroad for our public companies, so we have to explain to shareholders where the money is going, and having to deal with some of the issues we're dealing with really puts us in a bit of a bind as a public company. They're political issues, not the business issues that we should be dealing with.