Okay.
Listening to Babcock and Wilcox and the discussion of the potential reactors they're planning reminded me of other groups who have come and talked about putting reactors in the north. They were taking off-the-shelf technology produced in Japan and other places. One thing they said was that their business case would depend on how quickly they could obtain regulatory approval.
Now, I don't know how the business has gone for what they've done, but, Dr. Binder, with every new reactor, with every new program that comes before you looking for a safety case, how do you ensure the timeliness of approval in your own organization? What internal steps are you taking to make sure this is cost-effective? We cannot bring new sources of power, potentially nuclear power, to the north if the cost is too high. Apparently, regulatory impediments or the requirements are a major cost factor for companies looking to the north. How do you internally assess this so that you know that your regulatory process is not wasting time? How do you know it is effective and timely at the same time?