I would say the two considerations are inextricably linked. When a company decides that it wants to spend significant dollars, particularly in a global economy that's a little bit uncertain at the moment, we require a regulatory framework that provides some certainty of compliance now and compliance in the future. So if we have an air emissions framework that sees this perpetual movement down to zero when we're making a $2 billion investment in our Sudbury operations, and we have a provincial regulatory framework in that domain that is extremely complex and extremely uncertain, and the federal government come in with its BLIERs, for example, that creates a lot of uncertainty when you go to a board of directors and you say, “Can I please have $2 billion?” and they say “For what?” and you say, “To retrofit our smelters so that we're compliant with the law”, and they say, “After that's spent, will you be compliant?” and you say, “I don't know”. That's the kind of paralysis I'm talking about, and that's the kind of certainty we're looking for from government at all levels.
On June 21st, 2012. See this statement in context.