I just want to compliment Mr. Calkins for finally seeing that what we thought on Tuesday was the logical course of action, which is that motions be brought at the end and not at the beginning of a committee meeting. We flagged it in the NDP official opposition. I know that my Liberal colleague flagged it as well. We asked why you were bringing it forward right at the beginning of the meeting, because we had to hear the witnesses.
It turns out, Mr. Chair, that the two-hour debate was kind of pointless. Now Mr. Calkins, I understand, has understood that motions like this should be discussed at the end, out of respect for the witnesses. I certainly appreciate that he's seen the light. It would have been better, Mr. Chair, if he'd seen the light on Tuesday. We would have been able to hear from those terrific witnesses we had before us, but I compliment him on finally understanding what the logical course of action was on Tuesday, and it certainly is the logical course of action today. We'll certainly be supporting his motion.