There's one thing that I'm curious about and that I don't totally understand, and that is how duty to consult is or is not affected when you have situations where there have been settlements and negotiations already done. I could see that under some of the very early treaties, which were done a considerable length of time ago, this wouldn't have been thought through quite as thoroughly.
With some of the more recent settlements that will have happened around the country--and we're particularly thinking of northern Canada--would there have been elements of organized duty to consult in their settlement packages and so forth? Could you give me a bit of background in explaining how this has or has not had an impact, and what would be important, particularly north of 60?