First of all, of the 6,000 that we would do in a year, only 1% of them would end up either as a comprehensive study or as a review panel. Technically, according to the act, something that starts as a screening could receive a request to be elevated to a review panel, or a comprehensive study could be requested to go to a review panel. The request could come from a provincial government, an environmental association, or a proponent. It could be something that our own agency would consider.
One of the reasons why we would look to a review panel is if the environmental effects were expected to be significant. And if there were significant public concerns about the project, then we would use those as criteria to say yes, the public will be better served by having a review panel; they will feel comfortable knowing that there is an independent group of panellists considering the issue.