Okay. I have another question about it.
Is it possible that the decision could be appealed on the basis of the fact that the Government of Canada has preceded the panel's work and the consultation by coming out in open support of this project prior to this constitutionally required consultation and accommodation and is the same government that has determined the scope of the review and the members of the review panel? Could that prior support for this project actually be a cause for appealing the panel's decision, if it's a decision that goes against what the first nations are asking for?