The witnesses are from CEAA, which is a partner in this joint review panel, so I think it's a reasonable question.
My understanding is that something like 98% of the studies or the panel projects have been approved, but I haven't verified that number. I wonder if you could let the committee know what the number is when you've researched it.
I'm also interested in the comprehensive study. When you talk about a “thick document”, it sounds as if there's quite a bit of research going into it. There may be several annual cycles of wildlife impacts. With a panel, however, it seems to be more the public involvement that's expressed. Does a review panel have a similar level of scientific assessment of the potential impacts of a project, in comparison with a comprehensive study?