There's an indirect connection. Again, my observation is that industry proponents for projects, anticipating the value of having support from aboriginal communities, put a great deal of effort into negotiating what we call interim benefit agreements, which are essentially documents to improve relationships with the aboriginal peoples in a particular area. There are many elements to the investments that companies are prepared to make in order to improve that relationship.
Now, it's not a way to avoid the crown decision-maker having to fulfill its duty to consult, but having aboriginal groups fully supportive of a project, for whatever reason--including, perhaps, that they see the value of economic development in that area--is an important consideration for a decision-maker. The nature of duty to consult is that if an aboriginal group does not agree with the project, they will have many stages at which they can voice that opposition, including, ultimately, bringing challenges in the courts against the decision that's being made by the government agency or minister. So an industry proponent would be well placed to identify the value of jobs associated with a project, and aboriginal communities themselves have to make the decision about whether they support or don't support a particular project.
I don't know if that answers your question.