The duty to consult as articulated by the courts isn't articulated that way, because of course the courts were concerned with activities that would have a negative impact on the aboriginal community.
The way I see client departments approaching the issue, I would say with some confidence that they're well aware that a minister or a decision-maker has to take into account many factors to make the best possible decision.
The opportunities and the positives, I would think, should be given at least as much weight in decision-making as a potential adverse effect.