No, that's okay.
Number one, you said hundreds of millions of dollars of assets. I did not say that; you said that. I will have to come back to you on the assets.
On the contract, the $400-some million—$440 million, as I recall—is essentially a revenue stream that has to be matched by the actual commitments on the part of Candu Energy to meet that requirement, to do the work.
I will remind the committee that AECL had also received some funding and revenues from some of its contracts, but had managed to lose a lot of money on those contracts. The fact that there is a sale number attached to a contract does not mean there is a value unless there's a company that's able to produce that for less than the revenue.