I'd like to clarify something about Dr. Moore's study: he's not actually a member of CanGEA, he's a member of the ISEEE Group. However, he's a very august member of the geothermal community. With regard to his conclusion, yes, he is advocating that Canada engage in a significant mapping exercise. The expenditure that would be associated with that would be something on the order of $250 million.
With regard to loan-backed guarantees, while welcome at any corporate level, they won't necessarily unlock the development deadlock we have. I think there would be issues with higher priority projects.
Does that address your question?